StopPATH WV
  • News
  • StopPATH WV Blog
  • FAQ
  • Events
  • Fundraisers
  • Make a Donation
  • Landowner Resources
  • About PATH
  • Get Involved
  • Commercials
  • Links
  • About Us
  • Contact

Keryn's Adventure in Potomac Edison Land

4/30/2013

2 Comments

 
Alice isn't the only one to find herself tumbling into a rabbit hole where up is down and down is up and nothing is as it seems.

While trying to do a radio program about FirstEnergy's Potomac Edison/Mon Power plant transfer this morning, I found it interesting that every person who called in mentioned Potomac Edison's recent unjust and unreasonable billing practices.  And then I sat down to pay a pile o' bills when I got home and guess what?  There was my Potomac Edison bill.  The company has been urging customers with questions about their bills to call the customer service center, so I did.

Forty minutes later, I still didn't have logical answers to my questions.  I can only imagine how customers who have received astronomical bills they cannot pay must feel after an hour in Potomac Edison's "valued customer" funhouse.

First, I had to verify that I actually was a customer because my name supposedly isn't on the bill.  Now, we know that's just not true, don't we?  I guess that must be a common mistake, right, Randy?

After the first customer service rep. and I determined that the cause of my budget plan billings being inconsistent was Potomac Edison's lack of meter reading over the past year, it was suggested that I begin reading my own meter on those months that Potomac Edison can't make it to my house.  I was assured that Potomac Edison attempts to read meters EVERY MONTH, however they are only required to read them twice a year. 

After being informed that was complete and utter crap, she further insisted that Potomac Edison's WV tariff required only two readings per year and began to argue with me.  When I suggested she check her information with her supervisor, I got dumped onto hold for 29 minutes without explanation.  TWENTY-NINE minutes!  I guess I was supposed to hang up and go away, but I simply turned on the speaker and set the phone on my desk while I tackled the 472 emails that had piled up while I was away.  Oh... and I was highly entertained by Potomac Edison's hold muzak play list, which I have noted to share with you.... song by hysterical song:

You've got a friend


Still the same


Tight rope

Sister golden hair

Carefree highway


Good day sunshine

And here's where it got really hysterical...

How long (has this been going on)

Rocket man (and I think it's gonna be a long, long time)

Operator (could you help me place this call)


And just when I was starting to wonder what was coming next, "the supervisor" picked up the line and was not surprised in the least to find that I had been waiting 29 minutes and no one had bothered to tell her why I was calling.

At least she verified that Potomac Edison is required to read meters every other month according to their WV tariff and that the first customer service rep. was wrong.  I wasn't convinced that the supervisor actually would correct this misconception, however.  I guess it really doesn't matter how much Potomac Edison lies to you when you call for assistance.

However, while also verifying that my inconsistent bills were the product of Potomac Edison failing to read my meter, even she couldn't tell me why my new (APP) Summary only included 4 months while my neighbor's included 12.  Or why last month's bill was much higher for less kwh.  Apparently all my problems will be over if I only read my own meter from now on.  Right.
2 Comments

Reason for Potomac Edison meter reading and billing failure finally revealed!

4/24/2013

10 Comments

 
It's all Todd's fault!

According to a news story filmed yesterday by WHAG:
Potomac Edison is also renumbering work routes; meaning meter-readers will work in close proximity.

"That way if I finish my route, I can come over and help you finish your route. That should help prevent some estimates on the back-end of your route, where we couldn't get to a customer," says Todd Meyers, Potomac Edison spokesperson.
Well, color me steamed!  I invited Todd to come read my meter last year, and he still hasn't "finished his route" and arrived to do his job.

If you haven't seen Todd at your house either, be sure to contact him and let him know you need him to finish his route:

Todd Meyers
Maryland – Potomac Edison
West Virginia – Mon Power, Potomac Edison
Pennsylvania – West Penn Power
(724) 838-6650
email:  [email protected]

What does Todd mean "help me finish my route?"  I don't have a route!  Is Todd insinuating that I should be reading my own meter from now on, aka "my route?"  But that's what I'm paying you to do, Todd!

I'm also paying you to trim trees and maintain your equipment.  That's not news.  And sadly, yesterday's little drama was just that -- a play staged for the media.  Oh, look at us working today!  Big stinkin' deal!  This hole is much, much deeper than Potomac Edison thinks.

So, what has Todd been doing with the money we've been paying him for years?  Todd has a lot to answer for.  This is all Todd's fault!  Go ahead, give him a call!
10 Comments

Transmission Opposition 101 - Listen Live

4/21/2013

2 Comments

 
Tune in at 10:00 a.m. Eastern on Tuesday morning to hear the hour-long interview we did with WDRT's "Heart of Wellness" radio show.

The interview is a teaser for next weekend's SOUL Wisconsin Energy Action Fair, where we will be speaking.

Hope to see you at the fair!

Missed the show?  Listen to a replay.

Here's another article.

Won't we have fun?

2 Comments

Maryland Public Service Commission Opens Official Investigation into Potomac Edison Meter Reading and Billing Practices

4/12/2013

0 Comments

 
On April 9, 2013, the Maryland Public Service Commission opened an official investigation into FirstEnergy subsidiary Potomac Edison's meter reading, usage estimation and billing practices.

The Commission hereby initiates an investigation into PE’s meter reading frequency, estimation of bills, and compliance with its Tariff, and delegates this matter to the Public Utility Law Judge Division (“PULJD”) for appropriate proceedings.
The investigation into PE’s meter reading frequency, estimation of bills, and compliance with its Tariff is not limited to the Tufts and Sugarloaf Conservancy Complaints; the PULJD shall determine the full scope of the investigation, and designate additional issues as appropriate. The PULJD shall notify the parties, including the Office of People’s Counsel, of the date and time of a scheduling conference at which deadlines are to be set for, inter alia, PE’s production of documents.  The Commission hereby initiates an investigation into PE’s meter reading frequency, estimation of bills, and compliance with its Tariff, and delegates this matter to the Public Utility Law Judge Division (“PULJD”) for appropriate proceedings.
The investigation into PE’s meter reading frequency, estimation of bills, and compliance with its Tariff is not limited to the Tufts and Sugarloaf Conservancy Complaints; the PULJD shall determine the full scope of the investigation, and designate additional issues as appropriate. The PULJD shall notify the parties, including the Office of People’s Counsel, of the date and time of a scheduling conference at which deadlines are to be set for, inter alia, PE’s production of documents.
The MD-PSC is responding to the complaints of Mr. Richard Tufts and Sugarloaf Conservancy that were filed last year.  It looks like the PSC has heard its consumers loud and clear and has had enough of Potomac Edison's comedy of errors excuses.  Nobody is buying Potomac Edison's lies any more.

I've been circling round this issue in my spare time looking for the company's motivation for this continual incompetence, which coincided with the Allegheny Energy/FirstEnergy merger.  What's in it for FirstEnergy?

Potomac Edison's response to Mr. Tufts' complaint finally explains the game.
For more than thirty years, Potomac Edison's Maryland tariffs have provided that the
Company will read most meters every two months. This practice saves customers money, because fewer meter readers need to be used. For example, in Potomac Edison's last rate case in 1994, the expense filed for meter reading was just under $1.3 million for meter reading; if meters were going to be read every month, that requirement would have had to be significantly higher.

Footnote:  In fact, even with reading every two months instead of monthly, the Company was spending $2.0 million on meter reading (even without taking into consideration the new hires and other recent measures  discussed elsewhere in this response), substantially more than is collected in rates for this function.
Potomac Edison has been losing money on its meter reading function to the tune of $700,000 per year.  This could be easily remedied by filing a new rate case with the Maryland PSC to collect this difference.  However, the filing of a new rate case could also cause Potomac Edison to lose substantially more than $700,000 per year by setting a new rate of return for the company.  The rate of return that the company is allowed to earn on fixed costs in Maryland is currently set at 11.9%, and is the second highest ROE in FirstEnergy's distribution affiliate stable.  If Potomac Edison filed a new rate case, the ROE would be updated and adjusted to today's financial realities.  It is in FirstEnergy's financial interest to continue to collect rates set in the 1993/1994 settlement.  If it were not, the company would file a new rate case.  It has not done so.

The annual loss on meter reading expense compared to the risk to ROE stemming from a new rate case was a loss Allegheny Energy was willing to accept.  But when Allegheny Energy merged with FirstEnergy, apparently that was no longer true.  FirstEnergy wanted the best of both worlds -- collection of the full amount of meter reading costs AND the 1993/94 rate case ROE.  But because FirstEnergy couldn't collect more for meter reading AND maintain an 11.9% ROE, FirstEnergy opted to simply cut the cost of meter reading by slimming down their meter reading staff and not performing scheduled meter readings required by law.  If Potomac Edison cut their meter reading expense to match the amount they were collecting, the loss would stop and the company could keep its 11.9% ROE, having its cake and eating it too!

But now it appears the game is up.  If I were the Maryland PSC, I would require Potomac Edison to issue a refund to customers amounting to the difference between what Potomac Edison spent and what it would have cost to perform meter readings as required by law (around $700K per year, according to Potomac Edison.)  And then, as a punitive measure, I would make them file a new rate case.  :-)  How about it, FirstEnergy?

FirstEnergy has also been pulling the same stunt in other states in which it operates.  West Virginia's ROE is 10.5% and was set in 2007.  Pennsylvania's ROE is 11.5% set in 1994. These jurisdictions are where FirstEnergy affiliates have also been failing to read meters.  Coincidence?  I think not.

West Virginia legislators are not happy with Potomac Edison's excuses.  Could an investigation by the West Virginia PSC also be on the horizon?
0 Comments

FirstEnergy Pays $1.25M to Buy Union Advocacy for Harrison Plant Sale

4/2/2013

7 Comments

 
Just how important is the PSC's approval of FirstEnergy's plan to sell its Harrison coal plant from its competitive Ohio affiliate to its uncompetitive West Virginia affiliates Mon Power and Potomac Edison?

I dunno, but I think FirstEnergy just shelled out $1.25M to meet the demands of the UWUA 304 in exchange for a letter from UWUA to the WV PSC supporting the plant sale.

Must be pretty important then.  In that case, I suggest that all struggling industry or citizen groups (if you don't have a group, you can just make one up!) get aboard the shakedown train and sell their advocacy to FirstEnergy.  It's like growing your own money tree!!*

I'm not going to beat the union up about their deal with the devil.  They're just regular guys trying to make a living and FirstEnergy had been giving them a royal screwing.

What I do find absolutely hilarious though is how the threat of cozying up with StopPATH and Calhoun Powerline was used by the union to get its way.  Scaring FirstEnergy is our specialty.  Glad we could help ;-)

However the plant sale is STILL a bad idea.  I'm sure the union guys would much rather work at a plant that's financially subsidized by Mon Power and Potomac Edison customers than a plant owned by Allegheny Generation which is subject to the vagaries of competitive electric markets, and whose future is uncertain.  Can't blame them for wanting job security. 

But this plant sale will cost electric consumers over a billion dollars.  There are only 150 union guys but there are half a million Mon Power and Potomac Edison customers.  Be sure to let the WV PSC know that you do not support the plant sale.  Just click here. (submit comment on Formal Case and be sure to type in Case No. 12-1571-E-PC)

*(click here for FirstEnergy advocacy recruitment website to see how much your advocacy is worth to the company!)
7 Comments

Potomac Edison, Mon Power, and West Penn Power Billing and Meter Reading Practices - Incompetence or Corruption?

3/25/2013

6 Comments

 
It's been almost nine months since FirstEnergy subsidiary "Potomac Edison" wrote a nine page fairy tale to the Maryland Public Service Commission about its failure to read electric meters in Maryland, and it's been at least a year since customers began openly complaining about the company's meter reading and billing practices.  However, FirstEnergy subsidiaries Potomac Edison, Mon Power and West Penn Power still haven't gotten it right.

In fact, a new wave of unhappy customers is about to crash upon FirstEnergy's affiliate shores.

West Penn Power customers in Pennsylvania are unhappy with the company's failure to read meters in a timely fashion in accordance with state law.

"David Kline from FirstEnergy talked to the Waynesboro Borough Council on Wednesday about complaints about power bills having estimated meter readings several months in a row.

When Allegheny Energy merged with FirstEnergy two years ago, there were not many immediate changes, Kline said. However, computer systems and meter-reading policies started changing about a year ago, he said."


Right... those "policies" are just some of the "merger synergies" customers are receiving from the ill-advised Allegheny Energy/FirstEnergy merger in 2011.  The "policies" save this poorly managed company the operations cost of paying a meter reading staff a living wage, and as the company has stated many times, attempts to reduce its operating costs continue as it struggles to stay afloat.

Recently, a new scheme has emerged -- failure to bill Potomac Edison customers in a timely fashion.

"I, as I expect most of you, budget as closely as possible to the money coming in. It is the only way to function in this day of continuing rising costs and non-rising paychecks. When I saw that the bill had not come, I called the friendly customer service line and was told Potomac Edison was changing their billing cycle and I should receive my statement in about three weeks.

Not once did Potomac Edison inform me ahead of time that there was a change coming in billing cycles. Now I have received the statement which includes a month and about three-quarters of another month because the statements went out later than they used to. That has jumped my bill by a significant amount and we pay on the monthly budget plan!"


Without warning, customers are facing electric bills nearly double usual amounts, even customers who signed up for the company's "budget" plan which is supposed to average yearly usage and bill monthly so that your bill remains constant year round, no matter how much electricity you use.  Even though you are receiving two months worth of billing, Potomac Edison isn't giving you two months to pay.  Oh no, the entire balance is due right now.

The giggly "look at how incompetent we are" excuses from Potomac Edison, Mon Power and West Penn Power are wearing paper thin by now.  It's been a year since the problems started.  Instead of remedies, customers are being further injured by unjust and unreasonable billing practices.  Is it really corporate incompetence, or is it a sign of corruption?  You decide.


6 Comments

Grain Belt Express Clean Line "Code of Conduct" for Land Agents - Not Worth the Paper It's Printed On

3/20/2013

8 Comments

 
Holy plagiarism, Batman!  I ended up with a copy of Grain Belt Express Clean Line's "Code of Conduct" for Right-of-Way Agents and Subcontractors in my email today.

This silly document is nothing but window dressing masquerading as "proof" that Clean Line's land sharks are following some sort of moral compass.  This document does nothing to stop land shark abuse of landowners.  Who's supposed to enforce it?  Nobody!  What are the penalties or legal remedies for violation?  There aren't any!  It's your word against theirs.

This document has an interesting history.  Notice how it's written to supposedly prohibit certain behaviors?  Does the specificity of certain tactics seem a bit odd to you?  That's because each one of these land agent no-nos was a tactic actually perpetrated on landowners in Pennsylvania by land agents for TrAILCo.  This "Code of Conduct" came into existence through a court battle fought by the Pennsylvania Office of the Consumer Advocate, who is tasked with representing the interests of consumers, who had been victim to these very same land agent tactics.  In its original form, it was enforceable by the Pennsylvania authorities.  In its current incarnation, it's not worth the paper it's printed on.  It's mere suggestion that is more for the landowner's benefit as an imaginary security blanket than it is a set of rules for Clean Line's land sharks.

The "Code" was re-used by TrAILCo's parent company for their subsequent PATH project.  Turned out that the West Virginia PSC wasn't interested in enforcing it, therefore, the document was worthless.  PATH land sharks violated it constantly, according to affected landowners.

And now Clean Line has plagiarized this document from PATH, thinking it will fool a whole new crop of rubes in the midwest.  Not.  It's even complete with the same PATH-created typos... what a bunch of idiots you are, Clean Line!!

So, what's your best defense?  Refuse to speak or interact with Clean Line land sharks without the assistance of your attorney and insist that all conversations be recorded.  You'll still have to pursue any "violations" through civil court, but I have a feeling the land sharks won't be so willing to star in your own personal video production and will avoid you and your camera or tape recorder like a.... plague of bolt weevils, perhaps?
8 Comments

"Epic Rant" Against FirstEnergy

3/1/2013

6 Comments

 
Just read it.
6 Comments

Greedy Transmission Developers Putting Consumers in Peril

2/20/2013

0 Comments

 
It's not rocket science.  The longer the distance between generation and load, the more unreliable the "grid" becomes.  Long haul transmission lines provide opportunity for all sorts of failure... or mischief.

Apparently the Chinese military is hard at work compromising the security of the U.S. electric grid.  No big surprise.  Investor-owned utilities don't want to waste precious shareholder pennies on silly stuff like cybersecurity when there are memberships to The Duquesne Club to be purchased instead!

No matter how much the industry insists that it can regulate itself on the honor system, there is no honor among thieves.  Looks like Congress is going to have to intervene and bestow authority to FERC to regulate cybersecurity of the grid.  Just imagine how much this is going to cost when the obvious solution is so much cheaper and quicker -- stop "expanding" the grid and making it more vulnerable.  We don't need a whole bunch of new transmission, and a bigger, more interconnected grid exposes larger and larger geographic areas to one massive failure instigated by the click of a single key somewhere in China.

Thanks, Jimmy!
0 Comments

How to Grow Transmission OppositionĀ 

2/16/2013

0 Comments

 
This short little news blurb quite effectively epitomizes how and why opposition to transmission projects develops.

It's because the utility shows up with a fully formed "plan," then goes through the motions of "consulting with the community," but completely fails to allow the community any meaningful role in determining its own destiny.

In the example, AEP wants to put up some taller, metal towers on one of its easements.  The affected townspeople want to be involved in concocting a plan that would satisfy any genuine need for this work.  Because a true community consultation process could change the process undertaken to reach a common goal, AEP is resisting the involvement of the town in any actual planning.  AEP's idea is that it alone concocts a plan, then "consults" with the community by informing them of AEP's plan and expecting the community to buy-in and support it.

This will never happen.  Approaching a community with a front-load fait accompli plan is a recipe for creating opposition.

Here's a better method:  Approach the community with a goal.  Present several ways to reach the goal.  Accept and truly consider other ideas contributed by the community during the consultation process.  Allow the community to participate in the decision making to select an alternative that both the community and the company can live with.  Receive community buy-in and support of project.  Build project.  Retain community respect and goodwill.  Simple.

However, it's apparently much too complex a lesson for an arrogant industry with control-freak tendencies to ever learn.  When a community is prohibited from participating in decision-making, there is no buy-in, only resistance.  Stasis or momentum... ultimately the choice is the utility's.
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    About the Author

    Keryn Newman blogs here at StopPATH WV about energy issues, transmission policy, misguided regulation, our greedy energy companies and their corporate spin.
    In 2008, AEP & Allegheny Energy's PATH joint venture used their transmission line routing etch-a-sketch to draw a 765kV line across the street from her house. Oooops! And the rest is history.

    About
    StopPATH Blog

    StopPATH Blog began as a forum for information and opinion about the PATH transmission project.  The PATH project was abandoned in 2012, however, this blog was not.

    StopPATH Blog continues to bring you energy policy news and opinion from a consumer's point of view.  If it's sometimes snarky and oftentimes irreverent, just remember that the truth isn't pretty.  People come here because they want the truth, instead of the usual dreadful lies this industry continues to tell itself.  If you keep reading, I'll keep writing.


    Need help opposing unneeded transmission?
    Email me


    Search This Site

    Got something to say?  Submit your own opinion for publication.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010

    Categories

    All
    $$$$$$
    2023 PJM Transmission
    Aep Vs Firstenergy
    Arkansas
    Best Practices
    Best Practices
    Big Winds Big Lie
    Can Of Worms
    Carolinas
    Citizen Action
    Colorado
    Corporate Propaganda
    Data Centers
    Democracy Failures
    DOE Failure
    Emf
    Eminent Domain
    Events
    Ferc Action
    FERC Incentives Part Deux
    Ferc Transmission Noi
    Firstenergy Failure
    Good Ideas
    Illinois
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Land Agents
    Legislative Action
    Marketing To Mayberry
    MARL
    Missouri
    Mtstorm Doubs Rebuild
    Mtstormdoubs Rebuild
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    Newslinks
    NIETC
    Opinion
    Path Alternatives
    Path Failures
    Path Intimidation Attempts
    Pay To Play
    Potomac Edison Investigation
    Power Company Propaganda
    Psc Failure
    Rates
    Regulatory Capture
    Skelly Fail
    The Pjm Cartel
    Top Ten Clean Line Mistakes
    Transource
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wind Catcher
    Wisconsin

Copyright 2010 StopPATH WV, Inc.